Stop the Madness! People Should be SHOCKED

Publisher's note: It is so obvious that our system is antiquated, obsolete and failing at every level. We have no way of removing failed political leaders. Our present condition attests to this:

    Senators: 6 years in office
    The President: 4 years in office
    Congress: 2 years in office

Look at our condition, our need for change is obvious. Never in history has a country ascended to such affluence, influence and power is such a short time and then so quickly descended to complacency, poverty and weakness. Wake Up! Stop the madness! People will ­­not be shocked if the president and Congress continue to do nothing, but they should be. They should be replaced by leaders that will be shocked. After you read this article, share what you have learned with your friends. Shock them into action, and together do something, we can make this country great again!



People are shocked to learn:

1. That almost a year before the recession, in February 2007, the Princeton economist, Alan Blinder, estimated that in ten years we would be losing 30 to 40 million jobs to offshoring. That’s about 300,000 jobs a month lost to offshoring.

2. President Obama has stimulated to save or create jobs lost from the recession, but totally ignores the 300,000 jobs lost to offshoring.

3. President Bush and the Federal Reserve stimulated the economy $7.5 trillion during his eight year term, and household debt during the same time stimulated the economy another $7 trillion for a total of a $14.5 trillion stimulation. President Obama stimulated the economy his first year over $1 trillion, and we have already stimulated the economy this year $1.142 trillion (6/9/10) with four months to go. So we have borrowed and stimulated the economy over the past nine and a half years $16.6 trillion, and the private sector is only creating 41,000 new jobs a month.

4. Stimulation is spent. We keep bailing out the economy boat as fast as we can with stimulation and refuse to plug the offshoring hole in the bottom.

5. Corporate America wants to keep the offshoring hole in the bottom of the economy unplugged. In short, Corporate America would rather produce in China than the United States. Producing in China, there is no hassle over labor, health costs, safety rules and environmental costs. The profit is almost guaranteed and there is no legacy cost. So Corporate America is only interested in stimulating consumption in the United States so that its Chinese production can be consumed in the United States. Looking at imports, the little stimulation experienced is in China, not the United States.

6. The economists for Corporate America, Wall Street, the big banks and the financial community, all act like globalization or offshoring is a given. Nothing can be done. We in the United States have to reconcile the fact that anything can be produced anywhere and our environment, safety and standard of living, will have to be adjusted downward in order to survive.

7. Corporate America wants to keep its stock up on Wall Street with offshored profits. To keep its stock up and continue offshoring, Corporate America and its economists, its entities, like the Business Roundtable and the United States Chamber of Commerce, its editorialists and its political pundits, all engage in a charade of “free trade,” “protectionism,” “don’t start a trade war.”

8. As Henry Clay stated on the floor of the United States Senate in 1832: “Free trade! Free trade! … It never existed; it never will exist ….” And as Teddy Roosevelt stated: “Thank God, I’m not a Free Trader.” Globalization is nothing more than a trade war with production looking for a cheaper country to produce.

9. Countries in Europe and the Pacific all engage in the trade war, which has developed not only for production and jobs, but investments, research, technology and development. Intel has left Silicon Valley for China, and Microsoft research is in China. Germany, with its 19 percent VAT, recently announced the production of windmills in Charleston, S. C. With parts produced in Germany and exported at a 3 percent cost to Charleston, German production in the United States enjoys a 16 percent advantage over domestic production. Highballing the cost of producing parts in Germany, little income tax is paid for production of its windmills in the United States. Germany has established a beachhead to take over the energy jobs that the president and Congress keep saying we ought to develop.

10. The United States has to come in from the cold in the trade war and engage or compete in globalization.

11. Fortunately, we have trade laws in place to protect our economy. And President Obama can move immediately with a change in our tax laws and enforce our trade laws and make it profitable for Corporate America to produce in the United States:

    (a) President Obama could move like President Nixon in 1971 with an import surcharge to repair our devastating deficit in the balance of trade; and put the world on notice that the United States has come in from the cold in the trade war and now will compete in globalization.
    (b) President Obama, like President Kennedy in 1961, could enforce the War Production Act of 1950, making sure that the United States did not have to depend on foreign supply for materials necessary for our national security, but have a domestic production and supply creating millions of jobs.
    (c) President Obama doesn’t have to wait for Corporate America to go bankrupt needing a bailout, under Section 201 of the Trade Act he could move with tariffs or import quotas to protect vital domestic production that is endangered.
    (d) As other countries require of themselves in the trade war, enforce “Buy American” on U.S. government contracts.

12. Unfortunately, if the president or Congress moves to change our trade laws enforced, coming down on the head of the president and Congress in opposition will be Wall Street, the big banks, the financial community, Corporate America, and their economists, editorialists, political pundits, and their entities, like the Business Roundtable and the United States Chamber of Commerce, crying “free trade,” “protectionism,” “don’t start a trade war.” This is the crowd that will contribute to your re-election if you are for “free trade” and do nothing. And this is the crowd that will contribute to defeat you if you are for competing in globalization and do something.

(13) Under the Constitution, all trade and tax laws must originate in the House of Representatives and no House Member will introduce a tax or trade bill unless sanctioned by the president. Our only hope is for President Obama to enforce our trade laws to protect the economy and make it profitable for Corporate America to produce in the United States in the trade war. But Corporate America objects.

People will not be shocked if the president and Congress continue to do nothing.

A change in the patent laws to reflect that any invention patented, hereon must be produced in the United States, thereon defended by our laws for a 10-year period.

 

The futurists within government realized that there was no way that the Capitalist System could ever honour the promises made to the working class since WWII.

The futurists recognized the "Generational Storm" on the horizon and knew full well that the capitalist system would never-ever pay the 12 thousand dollars per year as social security payments promised to 75 million Americans as they bgan lining up for their cheques in 2010 and forwards.

Britain relied heavily upon free trade as they began to collapse as a world power in 1870. (The collapse occured immediately after WWI.) The elite in Britain moved all their wealth into North America at that time.

Free Trade was never about the trade of manufactured goods.

Free Trade is impossible when currency manipulation is allowed. The more competitive the North American worker became, the more other countries purposely devalued their currencies.

Free Trade was about the ability of the financial elite to gain unfettered access to offshore banking systems and thus the ability to move their assets and wealth out of North America prior the collapse and subsequent social unrest as all the promises made to the working class within North America were broken.

Calm

 

"United States did not have to depend on foreign supply for materials necessary for our national security" is an obsolete statement. Given only the Chinese have the technology now to process the rare earth materials, there is no way the US did not have to depend on foreign supply
for materials as most of the current products have some levels of rare earth materials in them in order to work well.

 

...As policymakers, economists, statisticians, political theorists, researchers, academics, ...

Did you see any mention of actual production designers or producers in the sentence? How would one expect to save production jobs or produce anything with these people at the helm?

When Morons run the country, this is what happens.

 

Great Article!

I did some research and found the below interesting……

Susan C. Schwab is an American politician, who served as United States Trade Representative from June, 2006 to January, 2009 during the Bush Administration.
Remarks on January 15, 2008

Susan said,

Do the facts support the accusations of those who wish to wall off our economy and reject over seven decades of progressive liberalizing trade policies?

• Many warn that outsourcing and offshoring will ship our jobs abroad – and that our jobs at all levels are vulnerable.

My Comment would be: Ummm….today is July 18, 2010. America is in a crisis. We have an extremely high unemployment rate. This is fact!

Susan said,

Now is not the time to retreat or retrench

• Globalization will continue. It is a fact on the ground. As policymakers, economists, statisticians, political theorists, researchers, academics, and citizens – it is absolutely critical that accurately we model and measure the positive and negative impacts of globalization.

My comment would be: Ummm….I think we are seeing the negative impact on America. Today is July 18, 2010.

Susan said,

• We will grow our economy and create jobs by increasing U.S. exports and staying competitive – NOT by restricting imports. Ditto the importance of market opening for generating global economic growth, development and the alleviation of poverty.

My comment would be: Hmmm….we are concerned about poverty in other Nations but we seem to not be concerned about poverty in America? The unemployed is headed to poverty.

America is no longer a wealthy Nation. Let’s take a step backwards and help the American people and strengthen America’s economy before taking a step forward into Globalization.

Can someone let me know if I'm on track? I would like to take this up with Obama.

 

I think the Journalists here on this site and some visitors can do a better job in the U.S. Trade Office than what we've seen thus far. I agree...we need change in some areas of Government in order for our Country to get back on track.

 

and some visitors can do a better job in the U.S. Trade Office

I agree. I helped the Chinese many years ago, but when suggested to our leaders, they replied that everything has been taken care of. So, you know how this is going...pay checks are more important than national well-being.

 

Couldn't agree more. So, what's the motivation for someone to run for state or national-level office, and how do they get there? Get the motivation and financing right, and the rest will take care of itself. My worry is that the motivations of many current politicians are power, control, and greed. They don't have the moral backbone to do the right thing. Ironically, the best thing for them to do is often nothing! The financing is all screwed up as well. It takes a TON of money to get elected to national office. It just shouldn't be that way.

So great, what are some answers? After all, complaining doesn't get us anywhere right?

First, abolish the Electoral College. Avote should count the same whether it's cast in New York or Texas. The 2000election should not have ended the way it did. The popularvote should be all that matters.

Second, reformcampaign finance. Have advertising be 100% publicly funded for all individuals that garner a minimum number of confirmed signatures. Require uniform exposure to all candidates achieving this minimum level of popular support in debates and town hall meetings. Can't do much about media reporting...free speech and all. But at least it would help to level the field and reduce the impact of private funds.

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a><em> <strong><b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is designed to prevent spam submissions. Unregistered visitor comments must await approval. Registered guests may log in to avoid this validation and to see their comments posted immediately.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States
This Work, Stop the Madness! People Should be SHOCKED, by Ernest F. Hollings is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works license.

Copyright © 2010 EconomyInCrisis.org

Letters to the editor

Sign up for our Newsletter

advertisement


Economic Crisis in US news, analytics, recommendations

Donate Today!






Download our Video Podcast from iTunes

Want to get involved? Sign up today!

Recent Comments