[ close ]


Bg1

Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Unemployment Report Brings Effectiveness of Stimulus into Question

Published 07/02/09 Dustin Ensinger - Print Article
E-mail - editor@economyincisis.org

For the ninth consecutive month, the unemployment rate rose, suggesting that the beleaguered U.S. economy is far from bottoming out and the Obama administration’s $787 billion stimulus package may not be having its desired effect.   

The unemployment rate rose to 9.5 percent in the month of June from 9.4 percent in May, according to statistics released by the U.S. Labor Department.  That is less than the 9.6 percent unemployment rate economists had predicted.   

That slight rise, however, was blunted by the fact that a total of 467,000 jobs were shed in June - much higher than the 365,000 jobs expected to be lost in June.   

"The disappointing report highlights the severity of the downturn and suggests a bottom for employment is not near," Sophia Koropeckyj at Moody's Economy.com, told AFP. 

All told, the economy has shed an astounding 6.5 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007.  In just the first six months of 2009, 3.4 million jobs have been lost.   

The June losses were widespread, affecting nearly every sector of the economy.  The only two sectors that did not experience job loss were education and health care.   

Manufacturing jobs continued to disappear rapidly in June, with 136,000 lost.  A total of 1.9 million manufacturing jobs have been shed since the recession began in December 2007.    

"In June, there were large decreases in manufacturing, construction, and professional and business services," said Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Keith Hall in a statement. "Together, these three sectors have accounted for nearly three-quarters of the jobs lost since the recession began.”

The continued rise in job losses may be a sign that the Obama administration’s $787 billion stimulus package may not be saving and creating the jobs that the administration promised it would.   

 “The stimulus has probably stabilized income, but it has not moved the economy forward,” John E. Silvia, chief economist at Wachovia Corporation, told The New York Times. “It’s a finger in the dike. But in terms of getting the economy going, there’s no evidence of that yet.”


Source CNNMoney.com:

The battered U.S. labor market took a step backwards last month as employers trimmed more jobs from their payrolls in June, according to a government report Thursday.

There was a net loss of 467,000 jobs in June, compared with a revised loss of 322,000 jobs in May. This was the first time in four months that the number of jobs lost rose from the prior month.

Click Here For Solutions To America's Economic Problems

Click here to contact your Representative in Congress.

Unless the above article is already copyrighted, this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License, EIC grants permission to use this article in whole or in part provided attribution is given, preferably in the form of a link back to EconomyInCrisis.org.

MORE OF TODAY'S NEWS | Comment on this Article | Read Comments


Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Register for newsletter

Bg2

Please Donate to EconomyinCrisis.org today



Please do your part, send a donation of $5, $10, $15 or any amount by PayPal or major credit card.

Bg2

Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2



Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter


Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2

Additional Recommended Articles from the Archives


Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Bg2

Donate Today


Bg2

Comment on this article

Subject

Comment



Bg2

Article Comments From Readers

guest says "Giving Money to Rich Banksters Does Not Create Jobs" on 07/04/09
It's become clear that giving trillions of taxpayers' dollars to rich bankers and financiers has done nothing to help the economy. The assumption that the economy would be saved if investors could just borrow enough money to invest and purchase capital equipment was nonsensical from the start. You can give investors all the money in the world--via loans or direct handouts--and they won't invest a penny of it unless there's demand for the goods or services that investment would facilitate. With a capacity utilization rate at a decades low of 69%, there is simply no need for capital investment, nor need for borrowing to bolster capital equipment purchase. The missing ingredient is the aggregate demand, largely consumer demand, that is necessary to create investment demand. Giving investors money, as has been the Obama-Bernanke-Geithner plan, does nothing to increase demand for investment. It simply makes capital available for investment--which is already plentiful compared to the production demand existing at present.

Worse still is that this mis-allocation of taxpayers' money to bankers deprives other areas of funds, and uses up our limited ability to provide real stimulus for the economy.

No banker ever created wealth. Only producers do. Bankers only redistribute and maldistribute wealth, while extracting wealth from those they do business with, and extracting wealth from those who actually DO produce something.

It's time to stop the bank bailouts, and let insolvent banks eat their losses. Only then will our recovery begin.

unlawflcombatnt

http://www.unlawflcombatnt.proboards84.com/