[ close ]


Bg1

Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

One Main Solution for the Economy: Fix Our Trade Imbalance with China video

Published 05/11/09 Peter Morici, with video by Criag Harrington - Print Article
E-mail - editor@economyincisis.org


The following article originally appeared on BaltimoreSun.com.

To dig out of the "Great Recession," Washington needs to challenge China on trade and currency manipulation - but President Barack Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner must recognize that Beijing only has the leverage Washington gives it.

The nation needs to realize that this is no Eisenhower recession, caused by too much inventory. Rather, this meltdown was caused by structural imbalances in the global economy that no stimulus spending can fix.

Dysfunctions on Wall Street notwithstanding, China and several other developing countries produce far more than they consume and enjoy huge trade surpluses, thanks to artificially undervalued currencies, export subsidies and import restrictions. Those require the Americans to consume far more than they produce and for the United States to amass huge trade deficits and foreign debt - otherwise, global demand falls short of supply and unemployment skyrockets.

Once Americans were no longer able to live beyond their means, the global economy collapsed, and President Barack Obama has volunteered the federal government as the borrower of last resort. Now China says Washington borrows too much. That's like a drug pusher complaining about his clients' addiction. Yet, Mr. Obama appeases Beijing by offering to share stewardship of the global economy with this renegade mercantilist.

China's purchases of U.S. Treasuries and threat to quit buying are the elephant in the room. But those purchases are made necessary only by China's huge hoard of dollars that is contrived by Beijing's massive sale of yuan for dollars on foreign exchange markets to keep the yuan cheap, exports flowing, and jobs moving from Indiana to Shanghai.

The Peoples Bank buys U.S. Treasuries because it does not have any better use for the dollars it obtains manipulating the yuan to boost exports. If it quit using those dollars to buy Treasuries, it would simply have to put those in the vault and remove them from circulation. The Federal Reserve would have to replace those dollars in circulation by purchasing the very same Treasury securities Beijing now buys. In other words, the Fed would collect the interest instead of the Peoples Bank. That's not so bad.

How to accomplish it? To persuade China to stop buying dollars to suppress the value of the yuan, the United States should tax the purchase of yuan by American importers until China relents.

Message to President Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner: Fixing the trade problem with China would do more to boost demand for U.S. growth and employment than even massive stimulus spending could ever deliver.

Peter Morici is a professor at the University of Maryland's Smith School of Business and the former chief economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission. His e-mail is pmorici@rhsmith.umd.edu.

Click Here For Solutions To America's Economic Problems

Click here to contact your Representative in Congress.

Unless the above article is already copyrighted, this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License, EIC grants permission to use this article in whole or in part provided attribution is given, preferably in the form of a link back to EconomyInCrisis.org.

MORE OF TODAY'S NEWS | Comment on this Article | Read Comments


Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Register for newsletter

Bg2

Please Donate to EconomyinCrisis.org today



Please do your part, send a donation of $5, $10, $15 or any amount by PayPal or major credit card.

Bg2

Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2



Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter


Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2

Additional Recommended Articles from the Archives


Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Bg2

Donate Today


Bg2

Comment on this article

Subject

Comment



Bg2

Article Comments From Readers

guest says "Logical way to correct imbalance" on 11/05/09
We all know we have a trade imbalance not because Americans are not educated but because are Congress signed bills it doesn't read like outsourcing trade authority to the the Protectionist WTO. What better way to confuse a Congress mostly educated in law but to call a Protectionist agreement free trade. The US has very large trade deficits with countries that print money faster than the US does to undervalue their exchange rates, have high VAT taxes on US exports which causes the prices of US exports to be artifically high overseas and some of these countries require that to export in their country you have to setup a joint venture with local partners so that your technology can be copied. So as long as the trade barrier imposed against the US is not called a tariff or quota its called Free trade. This makes you wonder if most countries are members of the WTO then why in order to export in some other WTO member countries do you have to setup shop overseas to avoid barriers? I thought the WTO was for eradicating trade barriers not imposing new ones which can be done easily by changing the name from tariff to VAT tax.

To start correcting the imbalances the US needs to reduce corporate income taxes from the up to high 35% tax rate to a low rate like 5% to encourage every company that has left, wants to setup, or wants to expand to consider doing it in the US. Next the US needs to impose a VAT tax on foreign imports. It doesn't make sense currently to charge high income taxes and high corporate taxes for individuals and US companies that make a living and want to produce in the US when foreign goods from Protectionist countries with an agenda from their governments to put US companies out of business come in for free.

Next the requirement that to export in some countries you have to setup a joint venture with local partners so that effectively your technology can be copied I would say is a very very big barrier that has to broken down. If the country voluntarily doesn't want to scrap this barrier then VAT taxes as high as the moon should be imposed. Nothing about this barrier can ever be even slightly manipulated to be called free trade. Id rather be taxed heavily to consume foreign goods from Protectionist countries that have an agenda from their governments to put US companies out of business than to pay high income taxes or have US producers pay high corporate income taxes.

guest says "USA has somethings" on 10/05/09
USA still has new ideas. But that is the wrong thing to sell, because Chinese will buy the ideas for a dollar and sell back the products for 100 dollars.

We could make the products ourselves and sell them to the world for a 1000 dollars. But the problem is we destroyed our production foundation. We can not even build iPods or iPhones here. Thanks for the decades of screwed up industrial policy.

There are plenty of next generation high tech products we can make - but investors would rather invest in china than in the USA. Those who do, insist on manufacturing in China for better profit - country be damned.

guest says "US got to sell whatever they can to China to reduce the deficit" on 10/04/09
US kept saying they want to fix the imbalance but their actions are not consistent with what they've said. The US should discuss with China on whatever US have and is producing that China needs and then sell it to them.

Instead the US acted as if they are not in need to address the imbalance, refusing to sell a range of products and services to China. Don' tell me the US has nothing that the Chinese wanted. Look at Russia, India and even the Europe on how they trade with the Chinese.

guest says "China" on 05/12/09
While we have a trade deficit of 266 Billion with China (2008) Canada, Japan, Mexico and Germany together create a trade deficit of 252 Billion. But the Chinese deficits are exponential...this non-linearity is killing us. People can not adjust to non-linear events.


guest says "Imbalance" on 05/12/09
The nation needs to realize that this is no Eisenhower recession, caused by too much inventory. Rather, this meltdown was caused by structural imbalances in the global economy that no stimulus spending can fix.

That is exactly correct. Why no one in the decision making jobs seem to get it?


guest says "Global market strategy jeopardizing national security." on 05/12/09
Whoever thought that putting everyone in the same boat would keep it afloat was terribly mistaken.The Global Economy has been a very profitable vehicle for a very long time.And now, when an economic crisis occurs, the world has watched as financial fears give way to rational thinking and markets control the world governments.Our elected officials swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution and the American people and both are in peril.China controls enough US wealth that,if it were to sell off its US treasury bonds at a record pace,it could devalue the US Dollar and collapse our economy in a matter of days if not hours.Thomas Jefferson warned Americans that banking institutions could undermine this country and make it vulnerable.This debacle that our elected officials have created could be the beginning of the end for capitalism and our way of life.The 'change' that people 'hope' for is coming.Be careful what you wish for.