[ close ]


Bg1

Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Windy Future for Alternative Energy

Published 01/07/09 Craig Harrington - Print Article
E-mail - editor@economyincisis.org

Alternative energy was a hot topic in the first half of 2008 with oil prices on the rise and our economic outlook darkening. However, the recent five month decline in oil prices put a damper on most of the outcry for an alternative energy future as drivers seemed to face less pressure at the pump and short memories forgot the hardships of expensive oil.

The global slowdown is responsible for the drop in commodity prices – particularly things like oil – and when the rest of the world recovers we will likely witness another rise in oil prices. What we need to do in the meantime is use this opportunity to build up replacement technologies that will phase out expensive oil and toxic coal as energy sources.

One of the most sought after of these alternatives is wind power. Wind farms are a major part of T. Boone Pickens’ “Pickens Plan” and could be a vital cog in our drive to break this country’s addiction to foreign oil. Wind Farms offer a chance to tap into an unlimited resource which is inexhaustible and readily available. Most forms of wind power generation produce zero carbon emission – or pollution of any kind for that matter – and the production and manufacturing of turbine components would jumpstart an industry right here in the United States.

However, there are several major drawbacks to wind power as well. Wind farms require constant maintenance due to the incredible amount of moving components and machinery involved in each turbine. This makes startup and overhead costs a major issue, but at the same time it offers long-term job stability to the skilled crews who would be employed to maintain and upkeep the farms.

Perhaps the biggest drawback is the unreliability of the wind. There is a wind corridor in the Great Plans where the winds tumble down the Rocky Mountains like an avalanche. This corridor could provide up to 20 percent of the nation’s energy needs if harnessed to the fullest, however most of the country does not have the natural geography necessary to sustain major wind facilities. A wind turbine may generate well on the Great Plains or off the coasts, but it will sit uselessly in low-wind regions.

Because of this drawback, wind power cannot be relied upon as the United States’ only oil and coal alternative. Most politicians and citizens are looking for a quick fix and a cure-all which simply doesn’t exist, so they pull back from their support of a technology which fails to promise the results they want.

Instead of looking for a cure-all, we need a broad based initiative that makes use of any and every viable technology. We could incorporate nuclear technologies with up and coming “green” movements like wind, solar, geothermal and others and completely rewrite the U.S. electric grid. Wind power is not the only solution, but it is certainly a good solution. We have only a few courses of action to take: we could do nothing and hope that our finite oil and coal resources last forever, we could hope for a science-fiction breakthrough in cold fusion or stellar energy fantasies, or we could start building an array of facilities to power the world of tomorrow today. No nation, no civilization, can sit around hoping for a savior to come and rescue them, they have to take it upon themselves. Harnessing the wind would be a great place to start.


Source Times of the Internet:

Wind power is in fashion these days, with no greater of a proponent than T. Boone Pickens, a man who made his fortune selling old school energy solutions. Right now only about 1% of the world's electricity is produced by wind turbines, but the segment is growing faster than many other alternative energy sources. Wind turbines tend to be relatively low-tech, cheap enough to build, and are attractive for environmentalists because they don't emit greenhouse gases.

Click Here For Solutions To America's Economic Problems

Front Page Photo – windpower - Google Images © Some rights reserved

Click here to contact your Representative in Congress.

Unless the above article is already copyrighted, this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License, EIC grants permission to use this article in whole or in part provided attribution is given, preferably in the form of a link back to EconomyInCrisis.org.

MORE OF TODAY'S NEWS | Comment on this Article | Read Comments


Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Register for newsletter

Bg2

Please Donate to EconomyinCrisis.org today



Please do your part, send a donation of $5, $10, $15 or any amount by PayPal or major credit card.

Bg2

Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2



Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter


Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2

Additional Recommended Articles from the Archives


Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Bg2

Donate Today


Bg2

Comment on this article

Subject

Comment



Bg2

Article Comments From Readers

biguru says "Hot Fusion" on 01/08/09
Forget Cold Fusion, think Hot Fusion - the kind that Europeans are experimenting and building a prototype.

guest says "re: cold fusion" on 01/08/09
i think the whole point of mentioning cold fusion was the fact that it is a fantasy. The author even says that himself.

but you're right, we all just sit around waiting for that pie in the sky instead of taking action. This article should be seen as a call to arms of the alternative energy movement

guest says "cold fusion is a myth - energy needs are a reality" on 01/08/09
I love that you brought up cold fusion. To me, cold fusion is the point of human existence, to search of that which cannot exist. Cold fusion is like cooking meat without heat. There is no one cure-all answer. Where there is an abundance of water, we need to make energy with it. Where there is an abundance of air we do the same. We use nuclear where there is nothing else. This would create jobs and plenty of energy for everyone.

I think we should all have solar panels on our roofs and devices in our pluming to create energy from the flow of water in our pluming. That way they would be mass produced, making it cheaper and our electric bills would be smaller. We rely too much, as a people, on someone else. We need to take maters into out own hands. That is what made America great and it is the only way to make America great again.

Only a fool thinks that something can come from nothing.

biguru says "Energy Future" on 01/06/09
Yes, we should focus on Wind, Solar thermal, Solar direct, and Basic Nuclear Power to last us for at least 25 years before the Nuclear Fusion Technology solves our energy needs.

On nuclear fusion, the Europe seems to be ahead, what is wrong with us? See http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,599211,00.html