[ close ]


Bg1

Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Destroying America from Within

Published 11/17/08 Dustin Ensinger - Print Article
E-mail - editor@economyincisis.org

If a hostile nation were trying to infiltrate the government and destroy it from the inside out, well, they would be hard-pressed to do a better job than our current and former leaders have done. America and its policymakers have been asleep at the wheel for over two decades now. If they are not awakened very soon, America may find itself permanently stuck in a ditch.

One of the first actions a hostile nation might take to destroy our country would be to drive up the debt, making the nation subservient and vulnerable to the actions of others. Unfortunately, this is already the case, all through our own doing.

America’s national debt recently surpassed the $10 trillion mark. In 1971 the national debt was a mere $389 billion. Since Sept. 2007, the national debt has risen by $3.81 billion per day. Since 2003 we have added at least $500 billion to the nation’s debt each year. When unfunded obligations such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are taken into account the total is an astronomical $59.1 trillion. Now, 100 percent of our new debt is financed by foreign nations such as China, Japan and the United Kingdom.

Another excellent way for a hostile nation to take the country down would be to destroy our ability to remain self sufficient, which is exactly what has happened with the advent of globalization. Since 1978 America has sold 16,613 of its best wealth producing companies to foreign competitors in what can be dubbed “The Great American Sell Off.” Some of those companies are household names that have been vital to America’s economic and national security in the past. Companies such as Colgate-Palmolive Co., Citigroup, Century Steel Inc. and AP Petroleum LLC. have all slipped into foreign hands recently.

Hostile nations could try and pin the U.S. down with ill-conceived wars with little or no exit strategy, which basically sums up the quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan. America has already allocated $800 billion for the un-winnable war in Iraq. That is roughly $12 billion per month. To make matters worse, some $9 billion in taxpayer money is simply unaccounted for in the desert nation. Another $1 billion in equipment is missing - vanished into the thin, arid desert air. The total estimated cost of the war in Iraq is $3 trillion, with Afghanistan included that number balloons to between five and seven trillion. What’s more, the economic cost pales in comparison to the 4,188 American men and women that have lost their lives bravely and proudly serving their country.

In addition to the Great American Sell Off, the U.S. is allowing its companies to outsource jobs to nation’s with lower wage rates, little environmental protections and very few labor laws. American companies exploit the cheap labor of other nations instead of utilizing the resources we have at home. If an enemy wanted to destroy America’s economy they would probably provide shields in the tax codes rewarding companies that outsource, much as it is now.

All these policy failures by our leaders have allowed other nations to gain competitive advantages on the U.S. economically. Many hostile nations now have an entire arsenal of economic bullets in the form of gargantuan sovereign wealth funds that are poised to strike at any time, buying any American company they want, causing more wounds to the nation’s ailing economy. With so few U.S. companies remaining, we have now become hard pressed to support ourselves.


Corrected to reflect national debt of $389 billion in 1970.

Front Page Photo by johngiovanni1 - Flickr © Some rights reserved

Click Here For Solutions To America's Economic Problems

Click here to contact your Representative in Congress.

Unless the above article is already copyrighted, this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License, EIC grants permission to use this article in whole or in part provided attribution is given, preferably in the form of a link back to EconomyInCrisis.org.

MORE OF TODAY'S NEWS | Comment on this Article | Read Comments


Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Register for newsletter

Bg2

Please Donate to EconomyinCrisis.org today



Please do your part, send a donation of $5, $10, $15 or any amount by PayPal or major credit card.

Bg2

Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2



Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter


Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2

Additional Recommended Articles from the Archives


Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Bg2

Donate Today


Bg2

Comment on this article

Subject

Comment



Bg2

Article Comments From Readers

guest says "re: "Thoughts plus links"" on 11/18/08
Look genius, I don't think you're in any place to question to author... and the point you make about the auto industry/GM is completely moot. Why does it matter that GM's market capitalization is under $4 billion? They can still ASK the government for whatever they want... technically I could ask the government for whatever I wish and I'm not worth a dime. GM's capital situation has absolutely no bearing on the amount of money they could ask for in the industry bailout. Why even attempt to make a point if there is no point to make? And why call out the author when all you're going to do is make yourself look like an idiot?


Furthermore, wikipedia isn't just a big fabrication and if you really must question it, how about citing some scholarly publications (http://nowherenorth.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/accuracy-wikipedia-encyclopedias/)... see, I can Google and find a url to make my point too!

Finally, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are parts of the government, and so long as the government is in debt NOTHING is technically funded. All of it is insolvent if the overall is in debt. Imagine if your mother gave you $20 and your father gave you $30 dollars and you spent $25. Would you have spent 20 from mom and 5 from dad, all from dad and none from mom, or some combination of the two? The point is it DOESN'T MATTER. Regardless of where the money comes from it all is part of the same whole. Social Security has actually been making revenue for many years (making the national debt look better than it actually is), but as "Boomers" retire they switch from being assets to being liabilities. When the "Boomers" retire all the wonderful funding you speak of will be gone as the outlays will exceed intake.

So yeah, its pretty accurate to say that Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are unfunded; because they have no growth model for the future and unless taxes are increased (fat chance) they will ALSO become net debtors.

It is neither "lie" nor "deceit" to call them unfunded, but the simple statement that they ARE unfounded is in fact "profound" so I'll give you that much. Other than that, what is the point of everything you're saying?


guest says "Thoughts plus links" on 11/17/08
The national debt can be determined by visiting http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt.htm anytime you so desire. As far as Wikipedia is concerned it is only as good as the moron that writes it and/or the moron that reads it without further research and deliberate thought.

Another thought: "When unfunded obligations such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are taken into account the total is an astronomical $59.1 trillion." This kind of statement causes confusion and anger. Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security were funded but the surplus funds were invested in Government Account Securities (GAS) which are IOUs that earn interest in additional IOUs until we pay cash to redeem them.

Saying Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are unfunded is a profound lie and deceit. We need to invest the surplus funds in JOBS which create additional taxable income. All wealth comes from labor. Let's start taking care of labor so the working class can retire and the wealthy can yet be the greedy pigs they are.

Another thought: "Now, 100 percent of our new debt is financed by foreign nations such as China, Japan and the United Kingdom." This should be acceptable according to what I read in http://www.economyincrisis.org/articles/show/2023 whereas we are loaning four of these countries $120 billion dollars even though we owe them apx. $250 billion dollars.

You read that correctly, we owe Mexico, Singapore, South Korea and Brazil apx $250 billion dollars but we are loaning them $30 billion each. I guess the question begs to be asked, why not simply retire $120 billion of what we owe?

Link http://www.economyincrisis.org/content/debt

Another thought while the key board is yet working. Dustin Ensinger, do you ever read this site? You wrote Automakers Asking For Additional $25 Billion Published 11/06/08. The same day I find this, General Motors’ Market Value at $4 Billion
Published 11/06/08 Craig Harrington.

If GM is only worth $4 billion dollars, why in hell would we loan it a third of $25 billion which is now proven to be too little and the Big 3 are asking for more?

http://www.economyincrisis.org/articles/show/2040

http://www.economyincrisis.org/articles/show/2039



guest says "Destroying the U.S. from Within" on 11/17/08
This is exactly what I have been saying for the past few years; however, I call the administration & our leaders "The Terrorists from Within". We are wasting our time worrying about an attack on our soil. Just wait, we haven't seen nothing yet! The damage has been done and even a new administration with new ideas and change will not be able to get us out of this one.

guest says "The debt -- how much?" on 11/17/08
In 1970 a Wikipedia article -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt -- gives the public debt figure as 389 billion$, and they give a reference to the US Treasury for their source. This differs greatly from your figure of 25 million$ for 1971.