[ close ]


Bg1

Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Boeing Documents How Airbus Skewed Rules

Published 06/12/08 EIC Staff - Print Article
E-mail - editor@economyincisis.org

One week from today the Government Accountability Office (GAO) will rule on the legitimacy of the $40 billion Air Force-Airbus deal. European Airbus was awarded the contract over the more qualified American based Boeing. The Economic Policy Institute estimates 14,000 U.S. jobs will be lost because of this contract.

Boeing has listed a series of indictments below documenting irregularities in the awarding process, which further calls into question the legitimacy of the contract. It looks like the deck was stacked against Boeing from the beginning:

Source Seattle Times:

The Air Force misled Boeing, indicating it preferred a smaller aircraft, so Boeing decided not to offer its larger 777.

• The cost analysis was badly skewed so that the two planes came out even. Boeing contends the larger Airbus planes, even though fewer are needed, would be more expensive.

• The mission requirements were belatedly adjusted to favor the A330. Boeing says its smaller airplane is better suited to operate out of austere airfields near combat zones.


Front Page Photo by Ack Ook- Flickr © Some rights reserved

Click here to contact your Representative in Congress.

Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Bg1

Economy In Crisis relies on financial support from its readers. Learn more.

Your endorsement is greatly appreciated. Click here for other ways to get involved.

Bg1

Comment on this article

Subject
Comment


Article Comments From Readers

Bg1