|
Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles A Bankrupt SuperpowerE-mail - editor@economyincisis.org |
|
In his famous book, The Collapse of British Power (1972), Correlli Barnett reports that in the opening days of World War II Great Britain only had enough gold and foreign exchange to finance war expenditures for a few months. The British turned to the Americans to finance their ability to wage war. Barnett writes that this dependency signaled the end of British power. From their inception, America's 21st century wars against Afghanistan and Iraq have been red ink wars financed by foreigners, principally the Chinese and Japanese, who purchase the US Treasury bonds that the US government issues to finance its red ink budgets. The Bush administration forecasts a $410 billion federal budget deficit for this year, an indication that, as the US saving rate is approximately zero, the US is not only dependent on foreigners to finance its wars but also dependent on foreigners to finance part of the US government's domestic expenditures. Foreign borrowing is paying US government salaries--perhaps that of the President himself--or funding the expenditures of the various cabinet departments. Financially, the US is not an independent country. The Bush administration's $410 billion deficit forecast is based on the unrealistic assumption of 2.7% GDP growth in 2008, whereas in actual fact the US economy has fallen into a recession that could be severe. There will be no 2.7% growth, and the actual deficit will be substantially larger than $410 billion. Just as the government's budget is in disarray, so is the US dollar which continues to decline in value in relation to other currencies. The dollar is under pressure not only from budget deficits, but also from very large trade deficits and from inflation expectations resulting from the Federal Reserve's effort to stabilize the very troubled financial system with large injections of liquidity. A troubled currency and financial system and large budget and trade deficits do not present an attractive face to creditors. Yet Washington in its hubris seems to believe that the US can forever rely on the Chinese, Japanese and Saudis to finance America's life beyond its means. Imagine the shock when the day arrives that a US Treasury auction of new debt instruments is not fully subscribed. The US has squandered $500 billion dollars on a war that serves no American purpose. Moreover, the $500 billion is only the out-of-pocket costs. It does not include the replacement cost of the destroyed equipment, the future costs of care for veterans, the cost of the interests on the loans that have financed the war, or the lost US GDP from diverting scarce resources to war. Experts who are not part of the government's spin machine estimate the cost of the Iraq war to be as much as $3 trillion. The Republican candidate for President said he would be content to continue the war for 100 years. With what resources? When America's creditors consider our behavior they see total fiscal irresponsibility. They see a deluded country that acts as if it is a privilege for foreigners to lend to it, and a deluded country that believes that foreigners will continue to accumulate US debt until the end of time. The fact of the matter is that the US is bankrupt. David M. Walker, Comptroller General of the US and head of the Government Accountability Office, in his December 17, 2007, report to the US Congress on the financial statements of the US government noted that "the federal government did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting (including safeguarding assets) and compliance with significant laws and regulations as of September 30, 2007." In everyday language, the US government cannot pass an audit. Moreover, the GAO report pointed out that the accrued liabilities of the federal government "totaled approximately $53 trillion as of September 30, 2007." No funds have been set aside against this mind boggling liability. Just so the reader understands, $53 trillion is $53,000 billion. Frustrated by speaking to deaf ears, Walker recently resigned as head of the Government Accountability Office. As of March 17, 2008, one Swiss franc is worth more than $1 dollar. In 1970, the exchange rate was 4.2 Swiss francs to the dollar. In 1970, $1 purchased 360 Japanese yen. Today $1 dollar purchases less than 100 yen. If you were a creditor, would you want to hold debt in a currency that has such a poor record against the currency of a small island country that was nuked and defeated in WW II, or against a small landlocked European country that clings to its independence and is not a member of the EU? Would you want to hold the debt of a country whose imports exceed its industrial production? According to the latest US statistics as reported in the February 28 issue of Manufacturing and Technology News, in 2007 imports were 14 percent of US GDP and US manufacturing comprised 12% of US GDP. A country whose imports exceed its industrial production cannot close its trade deficit by exporting more. The dollar has even collapsed in value against the euro, the currency of a make-believe country that does not exist: the European Union. France, Germany, Italy, England and the other members of the EU still exist as sovereign nations. England even retains its own currency. Yet the euro hits new highs daily against the dollar. Noam Chomsky recently wrote that America thinks that it owns the world. That is definitely the view of the neoconized Bush administration. But the fact of the matter is that the US owes the world. The US "superpower" cannot even finance its own domestic operations, much less its gratuitous wars except via the kindness of foreigners to lend it money that cannot be repaid. The US will never repay the loans. The American economy has been devastated by offshoring, by foreign competition, and by the importation of foreigners on work visas, while it holds to a free trade ideology that benefits corporate fat cats and shareholders at the expense of American labor. The dollar is failing in its role as reserve currency and will soon be abandoned. When the dollar ceases to be the reserve currency, the US will no longer be able to pay its bills by borrowing more from foreigners. I sometimes wonder if the bankrupt "superpower" will be able to scrape together the resources to bring home the troops stationed in its hundreds of bases overseas, or whether they will just be abandoned. Paul Craig Roberts is an economist. He served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration where he earned the nickname the “Father of Reaganomics.” He was an editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week and Scripps Howard News Service. In 1993, Forbes Media Guide ranked him as one of the top seven journalists in the United States. Currently he is a nationally syndicated columnist for Creators Syndicate and a frequent contributor to EconomyInCrisis.org. Click here to contact your Representative in Congress. Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles
|
|
guest says "Economists lead from the rear" on 04/19/08
|
|
guest says "Very liberal" on 04/17/08
|
|
Also, stop with this Patriotic crap. I'm sorry if it offends anyone, but this is the exact reason as to why we make stupid decisions. It is not only about the United States anymore. It is about the WORLD. We are not in the 1950's and 60's. We chose to integrate, now deal with it.
|
|
guest says "Very Liberal" on 04/17/08
|
|
Many of the points Paul makes are valid, however, turning back on NAFTA will simply hurt our economy. The problem doesn't lie simply in offshoring and integration of the world economies, but in our Government. I am a democrat, however, taking a liberal view on the economy is not what the U.S needs to do. The problem lies with our Governments stance on China. In one aspect we despise the Chinese for "screwing" us over, and in the other we greet them with open arms. I believe that the U.S needs to build stronger ties with countries like India. In addition, we need to understand that the U.S is NOT a manufacturing country anymore. We need to divert our resources towards services. Finally, we need to invest in infrastructure. Our government has ignored the fact that our railways, roads, airports, etc. are all falling apart and are used to capacity. It is time we stop spending money on futile things and re-invest in our own country.
|
|
guest says "Thanks" on 04/08/08
|
|
Thank you Adil and Paul.Both of you are right on the mark and patriotic in alerting our nation of the blunderous, wasteful and destructive path that US foreign policy has been on since Korea.
The United States has no duty, obligation, responsibility or right to intervene into the affairs of foreign nations without their express permission and public consent. Limited and temporary humanitarian relief is the only right course of action to take save self defense when we are attacked by a sovereign nation as was the case in WW II. John McCain is essentially a modified Cold Warrior and still has his Vietnam goggles on. He does not understood the history of empires and their repeated vainglorious blunders nor the vicious circle the USA has put itself in in Iraq. He does not recognize that American Imperialism creates more chaos, bankruptcy, world misery, and destruction of human culture even as it threatens to destroy the long term health, wealth and stability of our nation. America's foreign policy is one of ignorant self destruction and suicide. Democrats are just as guilty based not on their rhetoric but their voting record. Only Ron Paul (no londer running) and Ralph Nader VoteNader.org are substantively different. |
|
guest says "A Bankrupt Superpower" on 04/07/08
|
|
Senator John McCain needs to read this article and then invite Mr. Paul Graig Roberts or Naom Chomsky or Professor Joseph Stiglitz to explain it to him line by line. I have heard what the senator was saying about the Iraq war. You can easily get the impression that he is really ignorant of many economic issues. He was a pilot and yet he does not understand economic and military history. Usually, these things are taught in military academies. The senator who likes and supports wars talks about the national honor, but he has forgotten the fact that under monopoly capitalism there is no national honor. The current two wars are for making profits and wealth for the military complex and oil corporations at the expense of the underlying population. The public cost of the war is higher than the private corporate benefits. Thus, the country is getting squeezed and is economically disintegrating for the few. The private profitability goal is not compatible with national honor. The national honor is to defend the country, to spread freedom and democracy, and to liberate other nations from foreign occupation. Now, Iraq has been occupied, our civil liberty is deteriorating, and the leading Iraqi party, AL-Dawa, has been a well-known terrorist organization supported by the Iranian Mullahs since 1979. Some members of this party even bombed students at a well-known university in Baghdad, Iraq in 1980. At any rate, these wars have damaged our national honor, because we have destroyed a country that did not threaten us, a country whose leading dictator was fighting the Iranian Mullahs for the national security of some Arab regimes who had fear of the diffusion of the Iranian Revolution. In addition, we have brought a terrorist organization to be in charge of Iraq. It follows that we have established a triangle of occupation and economic destruction, deterioration of liberty, and terrorist friends in Iraq, a triangle that does not generate national honor; rather, it creates global dishonor. In short, the senator is telling us that the underlying population has to sacrifice for the wars but he has never informed those beneficiary giant corporations to share their profits with the American people, or to sacrifice financially, not physically, for the underlying population. Best Regards, Adil Mouhammed.
|
Almost all economists have this funadamental misunderstanding-that somehow the economy is King and should unquestionably dicatate control over people's lives.
According to Capitalist economists, its perfectly OK that:
*Jobs are deported to lower wages
*illegal aliens are given a free pass to be volutary slaves
*the environment is a free dumping ground for air, water and land pollution
*that obscene concentrations of wealth at others expense and increasingly disproportiaonate wealth allocation is an acceptable outcome
In Capitalist Economists philosophy, People are reduced to mindless worker ants (disposable units of portable labor) or slaves to the machinations of Capitalism without consideration that they might have souls and families and concerns as human beings or that they might not enjoy scrambling for every last dollar just to worship "low wage efficiency".
Economists effectively treat humans inhumanely in practice and policy recommendations (not in rhetoric)
What's wrong is that they think look at the end result (the economy) as being the prime mover and causitive agent rather than as a consequent of human labor and creativity and toil.
That's why Economists engage in magical thinking exercises about outsourcing jobs to create jobs, and borrowing more while lowering taxes, and that devaluing the dollar lowers loan repayment, and that trust is infinitely stretchable in currencies so no bullion anchor is needed to give value
Those who give primacy to the Economy over workers and their jobs are trying to fix the problem through misdiagnosis.
The correct way to manage the economy is to ask first what is desirable and best in the public interest and welafare and how can it be created.
The government exists solely to work for and protect the public good, welfare and happiness of the citizens. A government that fails in this regard is not worthy of name.
Guaranteed jobs.
Guaranteed living wage
Guaranteed worker protections
Freedom from Union discrimination and access at all work places
Guaranteed benefits
35 hour workweek
Prohibition against outsourcing or insourcing illegals to undercut workers and teir families.
Closing International trade with any country that has subpar standards.
These are just a few benefits to a planned and managed democratic nation.
We can see in America today the continuing result of putting the economy and the billionaire winners in the drivers seat while devaluing the actual workers who make our country. It ruins a nation to put the cart before the horse and wonder why there are so many problems.