[ close ]


Bg1

Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

A Stimulus to What? Delusions Prevail in Washington

Published 01/24/08 Paul Craig Roberts - Print Article
E-mail - editor@economyincisis.org

With his tax rebate policy, President Bush has put economic policy back on a Keynesian basis. Will it work?

During the two decades it was in effect, supply-side economics had restorative effects on the American economy. Its predecessor, Keynesian demand management, stimulated demand more than supply. Consequently, over time the trade-offs between employment and inflation worsened, and for a while it appeared that inflation and unemployment would rise together. The breakdown of the Keynesian policy opened the door for the Reagan administration’s supply-side approach.

By following Nobel economist Robert Mundell’s advice to “reverse the policy mix,” the supply-side policy allowed the US economy to grow without paying for the growth with rising rates of inflation. However, the new macroeconomic policy was not a cure-all, and its success in banishing worsening “Philips curve” trade-offs between inflation and employment masked the appearance of new problems, such as the loss of jobs and GDP growth to offshoring, problems from deregulation, and the growing concentration of income in fewer hands.

The Bush administration is turning to tax rebates, because problems in the financial system and the amount of consumer debt hinder the Federal Reserve’s ability to pump money to consumers through the banking system. Like an easy credit, low interest rate policy, the purpose of a tax rebate is to put money in consumers’ hands in order to boost consumer demand.

Will consumers spend the rebate, or will they use it to pay down their debts? If they spend the rebate on consumer goods, will it provide much boost to the economy?

Many Americans are overloaded with debt and will have to use the rebate to pay down credit card debt. The gift of $800 per means-tested taxpayer is really just a partial bailout of heavily indebted consumers and credit card companies.

The percentage of the rebate that survives debt reduction will be further drained of effect by Americans’ dependency on imports. According to reports, 70% of the goods on Wal-Mart shelves are made in China. During 2006, Americans spent $1,861,380,000,000 on imported goods, that is, 23% of total personal consumption expenditures were spent on imports (including offshored goods). This means that between one-fifth and one-fourth of new consumption expenditures will stimulate foreign economies.

Americans worry about their dependency on imported energy, but the $145,368,000,000 paid to OPEC in 2006 is a small part of the total import bill. Americans imported $602,539,000,000 in industrial supplies and materials; $418,271,000,000 in capital goods; $256,660,000,000 in automotive vehicles, parts and engines; $423,973,000,000 in manufactured consumer goods; and $74,937,000,000 in foods, feeds and beverages.

The Keynesian policy of driving the economy through consumer demand was applied to a different economy than the one we have today. In those days the goods Americans purchased, such as cars and appliances, were mainly made in America. Construction workers were not illegals sending their wages back to Mexico. The US had a robust manufacturing workforce. When consumer demand weakened, companies would reduce their output and lay off workers. Government policymakers would respond to the decline in employment and output with monetary and fiscal policies that boosted consumer demand. As consumer spending picked up, companies would call back the laid off workers in order to increase output to meet the rising demand.

Today Americans are losing jobs for reasons that have nothing to do with recession. They are losing their jobs to offshoring and to foreigners brought in on work visas. Today many American brands are produced offshore in whole or part with foreign labor and imported to the US for sale in the American market. In 2007, prior to the onset of the 2008 recession, 217,000 manufacturing jobs were lost. The US now has fewer manufacturing jobs than it had in 1950 when the population was half the current size.

US job growth in the 21st century has been confined to low-pay domestic services. During 2007, waitresses and bartenders, health care and social assistance, and wholesale and retail trade, transportation and utilities accounted for 91% of new private sector jobs.

When a population drowning in debt is hit with unemployment from recession on top of unemployment from offshoring, will the people spend their rebates in eating places and bars, thus boosting employment among waitresses and bartenders? Will they spend their rebates in shopping malls, thus boosting employment for retail clerks? If they become ill, the lack of medical insurance will direct their rebates to doctors’ bills.

Economists and other shills for globalism told Americans not to worry about the loss of manufacturing jobs. Good riddance, they said, to these “old economy” jobs. The “new economy” would bring better and higher paying jobs in technical and professional services that would free Americans from the drudgery of factory work. So far, these jobs haven’t shown up, and if they do, most will be susceptible to offshoring, just like the manufacturing jobs.

The Bush administration has in mind a total rebate of $150,000,000,000. As the government’s budget is already in deficit, the money will have to be borrowed. As the US saving rate is about zero, the money will have to be borrowed abroad.

Foreigners are already concerned about the US government’s indebtedness, and foreigners are bailing out some of our most important banks and Wall Street firms that foolishly invested in subprime derivatives.

Under pressure from budget and trade deficits, the US dollar has been losing value against other traded currencies. Having to borrow another $150 billion abroad will further erode the dollar’s value.

Meanwhile, Congress passed a $700 billion “defense” bill so that the Bush administration can continue its wars in the Middle East.

Our leaders in Washington are out to lunch. They have no idea of the real challenges our country faces and America’s dependence on foreign creditors.

The rebate will help Americans reduce their credit card debt. However, adding $150 billion to an existing federal budget deficit that will be worsened by recession could further alarm America’s foreign creditors, traders in currency markets, and OPEC oil producers. If the rebate loses its punch to consumer debt reduction, imports, and pressure on the dollar, what will the government do next?

As long as offshoring continues, the US cannot close its trade deficit. Offshoring increases imports and reduces the supply of potential exports. With Washington’s Middle East wars, with private companies ceasing to provide health coverage and pensions, with political spending promises in an election year, and with recession, the outlook for the federal budget deficit is dismal as well.

The US is moving into a situation in which the government could find it impossible to close the twin deficits without massive tariffs to curtail imports and offshoring and without pursuing peace instead of war. The outlook for the United States will continue to worsen as long as hegemonic superpower and free trade delusions prevail in Washington.


Paul Craig Roberts is an economist. He served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration where he earned the nickname the “Father of Reaganomics.” He was an editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week and Scripps Howard News Service. In 1993, Forbes Media Guide ranked him as one of the top seven journalists in the United States. Currently he is a nationally syndicated columnist for Creators Syndicate and a frequent contributor to EconomyInCrisis.org.


Front Page Photo by A.E. Wolf- Flickr © Some rights reserved

Click here to contact your Representative in Congress.

Unless the above article is already copyrighted, this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License, EIC grants permission to use this article in whole or in part provided attribution is given, preferably in the form of a link back to EconomyInCrisis.org.

MORE OF TODAY'S NEWS | Comment on this Article | Read Comments


Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Register for newsletter

Bg2

Please Donate to EconomyinCrisis.org today



Please do your part, send a donation of $5, $10, $15 or any amount by PayPal or major credit card.

Bg2

Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2



Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter


Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2

Additional Recommended Articles from the Archives


Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Bg2

Donate Today


Bg2

Comment on this article

Subject

Comment



Bg2

Article Comments From Readers

guest says "Stimulus" on 08/25/09
Stimulus, GOD was I stimulated?
It felt so Good, OOOOOOOOOO do I feel Good!.

guest says "It's a big ol' goofy world" on 01/14/09
Wow! I'm surprised at the understanding and suggested solutions for our problems from the comments. The simple truth is we absolutely can not borrow ourselves out of debt - especially with no investment vehicle to create manufacturing wealth. According to one of the articles here, the Budget Office has already said "bankruptcy" may be the only solution; however, that is not a solution because with it goes our sovereignty and all that is and has been "American!" - the "land of the free" has become of the "land of the indebted!" Eventually, we all have to "pay up" and the price may be overwhelming. I've always heard there are three kinds of people in the world - 1. Those that make things happen; 2. Those that watch things happen; and 3. Those that wonder what the hell happened! Unfortunately, "American" volition only exists in the latter two these days.

guest says "Silly Americans, All..." on 02/03/08
Keynesian economics got America into this mess by fooling naive people that government can SPEND its way to prosperity. It can't.

In the mean time, everyone blames Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, the Congress, Supremen Court, foreign oil, etc.

The cause of the problem is in your mirror, hypocrite! You want a free breakfast, lunch, and dinner; free healthcare; minimum wages; social security; medicare; farm subsidies; even healthcare for bankrobbers in Oregon (true). Then you whine when we're the biggest debtor nation in the history of the world.

Freedom comes with a price. Unfortunately, most here have financed their freedom with a credit card. Lazy, stupid Americans.

Does "forestalling bankruptcy" know how many jobs would be lost with a minimum wage of $25/hr. I bet his would be one, because ther's no way any employer can pay wages above the level of productivity to the employer. In addition, minimum wages are racist, since the workers adversely affected are mostly minorities and the uneducated. Hate for different races and the uneducated never solved anything, forestalling. You'd make a good plantation owner. You were just born in the wrong century!

guest says "Amen" on 01/26/08
Washington, CEOs, Elitists, have sown the seeds of our destruction as a nation. Why they have done this other than for their own benefit is anyone's guess. There are no jobs left in America for Americans. There is no investment in America's infrastructure, it's people or it's ideals. The whole country has been swallowed up in a scam orchestrated by those with power and influence. America is becoming the land of the mis-fortunates. The top 1% has royally had and continues to have the U.S. population over a barrel to no end. Hope for the future is dismal because the only way to change things is to displace the bums that have put us where we are now. They ain't gonna leave or give up their wealth or positions voluntarily.

guest says "Forstalling bankruptcy" on 01/26/08
A check for $300-600 may help me forestall bankruptcy for one more month, but will not solve the underlying problems of our weak and indebted economy.

A onetime surge of $300-600 won't even account for 1 week of salary. For those who have lost their jobs or are in danger of getting laid off, this is not the big fix. Nor is a 3/4 point cut in interest rates. Folks understand that these are "electoral credits" handed out -at future taxpayer expense-to shore up support for the Fall's Congressional elections.Will you be bough for $300?

I for one will not splurge but use the check to pay down my credit card bills and health insurance premiums. Even so, in my case (and I suspect in many others,) its simply too little too late unless someone can successfully persuade me that you can "borrow your way out of debt".

There are literally dozens of ways to improve the financial health and strength of our nation such as:
*Booting all illegals
*Imposing a $1 million earnings cap per year on workers and raising the minimum wage to $25 er hour.
*Halting all trade with China and imposing tariffs on foreign goods.
*Returning to the Gold standard
*Creating a new WPA program to rebuild the nation and put folks back to work.
*Halting the wars/occupations of choice in Iraq and Afghanistan immediately.
*Nationalizing health care and oil industires.

Will any of these corrective steps be done? Ha! I hope I am wrong and they will, but experience has taught me to doubt Republicans and Democrats equally.

As long as the overwealthy and the Business Roundtable CEO's control the debate and the politicians and the lobbyists and the media, we can expect that extreme personal greed will effectively beat out the desire to be a strong healthy united states and may be the achilles heel that will effectively destroy our nation.

guest says "Land of magic" on 01/24/08
Ah I love the land of unfettered capitalism where the magic of the market is worshiped. After millions burned their houses and spend, the magic of the market now enters its final phase - the nanny state. Everybody gets a checks! Borrow and spend - no need to pay back. Helicopter Ben has untold billions free credit for all to spend! Take Uncle Sam spanking $150 billion handout and spend! Yes more free money coming. No need to work. Just spend spend spend. Hell, even Argentines are envious.

guest says "AStimulustoWhat?DelusionsprevailinWashington" on 01/24/08
I would need a much more detailed statistical treatment of employment and unempoyment in the United States. Does Paul Craig Roberts really believe that we are all becoming waitresses and bartenders. I doubt it. But what really bothers is complete absence of any solution to our problems. How about an economic Czar to subsidize winners and offer protection to losers. Or better still how about autarchy to promote industrialization a la the Soviet Union. Or does Paul Craig Roberts have a better idea?

guest says "DELUSIONS" on 01/24/08
YOU HAVE A REFORMED DRUNK,NOW A BORN AGAIN CHRISTIAN,A SOLE BELIEVER THAT GOD ARDAINED HIM TO BE PRESIDENT,THERES YOUR DILUSION IN WASHINGTON,AMEN

ReformerRay says "Paul Craig Roberts" on 01/24/08
This article, by Paul Craig Roberts, is on target in all respects. Restrictions on imports is the beginning of the needed corrections.

How such restrictions are structured is all important. They should be limited, at least initially, to the 5 countries that accounted for 60% of the U.S. trade deficit in 2005 and 2006. They should included ALL GOODS PRODUCED IN THOSE 5 COUNTRIES.