Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles
American Manufacturing Can No Longer CompetePublished 10/03/09 Thomas Heffner - Print ArticleE-mail - editor@economyincisis.org Today there are fewer manufacturing employees than in 1955, and over the past 20 years 3.7 million manufacturing jobs has been lost. These figures are a grim reminder that America can no longer manufacture competitively. How did this happen? Two causes stand out: low international wage rates in countries like China and Mexico that America will not and can not compete with, and America’s abandonment of capital and knowledge intensive industries. American workers can not and should not have to compete with third world wage rates. Some Chinese manufacturers are paid 33 cents an hour according to a 2005 AFLCIO report. This cents-an-hour pay in many countries around the world has caused American companies and entire industries to move abroad (see the lost industry list here). It also lead Princeton economist Alan Blinder to estimate 42-56 million jobs could potentially be sent overseas. Japan has successfully navigated the problem of China’s low wage rates. China is one of Japan’s biggest trading partners and yet Japan maintains a trade surplus with them. The labor in Japan is leveraged; one person operates equipment that can do the work of 100 ordinary laborers. America used to manufacture this way but now produces little by comparison and increasingly depends on imports at a net cost of $1.5 million per minute ($765 billion per year) to maintain our standards of living. Auto and other manufacturing industries were once proud centers of American productivity, but have since seen their superiority usurped by technology based economies like that of Japan. The Japanese realized the gains of encouraging industrial growth and with hardly any natural resources turned their economy into an economic superpower that last year alone generated an $88 billion trade surplus with America and a $170 billion current account surplus with the rest of the world, the second largest next to China. Meanwhile, the U.S. has resigned itself to live on increasing debts. Since 1987 home mortgages have gone from $1.8 trillion to $8.2 trillion, consumer debt from $2.7 trillion to $11 trillion and household debt has quadrupled. Add to that a national debt approaching $9 trillion and you do not have to be an economist to realize the economy may not be as rosy as America’s GDP rating system would deceptively lead you to believe. Increasing debt, decreasing savings and selling off America’s principal assets, its wealth producing companies abroad. This is not a sustainable or responsible long-term economic policy. America can, and must, do better. How do we get out of this debt-ridden rut? The solution is to copy Japan’s model. Taiwan, Korea and many other Asian countries have adopted the Japanese East Asian economic model and are extremely successful. What if the economy had always operated as it does today with companies being sold abroad diverting wealth, jobs and production to other countries. Imagine the consequences in WWII if Chrysler had been under its recent 9 year-long German ownership. Chrysler produced the main combat vehicle for troops on the ground the Sherman M-4 tank. German ownership would likely have forced production of tanks for the Axis rather than America. That one acquisition would have deprived America of one of its best on the ground assets and could have greatly changed the course of the war. The World War II scenario is of course a hypothetical, but it illustrates the potential risk of continuing to sell our best companies from vital industries abroad. Investing in industry before WWII turned America into the most productive labor force and strongest country in the world. It’s time to make that investment again. If we don't our security and living conditions will not be as good for your children and grandchildren as you have experienced. Thomas Heffner is a commentator for EconomyInCrisis. Click here to contact your Representative in Congress. MORE OF TODAY'S NEWS | Comment on this Article | Read CommentsSpread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles |
Download our Podcast from iTunes
Additional Recommended Articles from the Archives
Follow us on Twitter
Donate Today
Comment on this article
Article Comments From Readers
|
Since the USA has de-industrialized, the USA has been sending title to US real estate and other assets to pay the people in industrialized countries to work to make the things that US citizens are consuming. The USA is almost completely de-industrialized, and the public pressure is being applied to eliminate the remainder of our industries with the proposed "Cap and Trade" legislation. US industries know that there will be many more future Environmental Regulations piled upon them and that they will have to comply. Our US businesses know that even if they can economically survive the current proposed environmental legislations, more and more environmental legislation will be piled onto them in the future. This means that if there is an economic analysis that would allow the factory to stay in the USA today, the business should fire the US workers and relocate that factory to a foreign country in order to escape the costs of future environmental regulation that the US government will certainly create.
Industrious productive nations like China, India, Brazil, Pakistan, and other productive industrious foreign nations grow wealthy and secure the value of their currency by producing and creating enough products to support the needs of their populations with their farms, factories and mines, plus they earn additional currency by creating additional wealth by exporting additional products that they manufactured. The economic health of every other business in that country depends upon their productive industries. These industrious nations will soon own title to most of the assets and wealth located in the USA.
Future generations of our children and our unborn grandchildren will have to work very hard and buy back these assets if that is possible.
Should I believe that US citizens are entitled to sit idle and not work in some dirty factory making the things that US citizens consume, when US citizens can obligate our grandchildren to work and pay for our easy living? This situation might end when the USA runs out of US property and other assets that foreigners will buy for the cash that US citizens need to pay the foreigners in foreign factories to make the things that US citizens consume.
The only thing that will create/save US jobs, preserve/restore the buying power of the US Dollar is reversing the trade deficit, reducing US government borrowing, and reducing US government spending of borrowed money, to start re-building the USA gold reserves which is the basis of the buying value of the US dollar. Only a positive balance of trade will eventually restore the value of the dollar, and we must accomplish this by any means possible, or we shall have to accept third world poverty for the majority of our citizens. The only way to do this is to produce and export more (dollar value of) things than we import. The only way that we can accomplish exporting US made products is to re-industrialize and make these products, hopefully with mostly US materials & Labor. The only way that our products will be sold abroad is if these products are either technologically superior, or cheaper. US citizens must manufacture and sell things to foreign countries in order to get US currency from foreign nations in order to buy back the US assets recently sold to and now owned by foreigners.