[ close ]


bar

The Issue: Colombia Free Trade

bar

THE ISSUE

The proposed Colombia deal is a continuation economic polices that have continued to push for access to the American market without assessing the costs to U.S. workers or industries. Since 2000, these trade deals have resulted in 3 million jobs being lost and seen U.S. production increasingly off-shored to third-world labor markets like China that ignore basic human rights and workers earn next to nothing in wages.

At home, American workers who lost their high-paying, high-benefit manufacturing jobs find work in low-paying, lower-benefit service jobs. The result is an American middle class earning and producing less- and the country’s balance of trade deficit topping $700 billion.



EIC POSITION

We oppose the proposed free trade deal with Colombia- it is a continuation of questionable and harmful trade stances that have decimated the American middle class. The affirmation of this deal would hastily entrench a long-term trade agreement. In the wake of mounting job losses, stagnating middle class wages, and increased off-shoring due to similar trade policies, common sense tells us that this agreement will be counterproductive to American workers and industries.”


WHAT THEY ARE SAYING

“The Colombia FTA represents a continuation of the Bush administration’s failed trade policies, an agenda that has contributed to the loss of over 3 million manufacturing jobs since 2000, skyrocketing trade deficits and paychecks that are shrinking at an accelerating rate.

Meanwhile, Colombia remains the most dangerous country in the world in which to be a union member—39 trade unionists were murdered in 2007, and another 11 to date in 2008. Of the more than 2,500 murders of trade unionists since 1986, only about 70 cases—around 3 percent—have resulted in convictions.”
AFL-CIO President John Sweeny


WHAT YOU CAN DO RIGHT NOW

  • Write a letter to your congressional representative and voice your disapproval of trade deals that have cost American jobs and opportunities
  • Join a discussion group via Meetup.com to find people in your area to talk about this and other issues with.


REFERENCES

Factory Jobs: 3 Million Lost Since 2000

Job Losses Due to Trade Since NAFTA Deepen

Job Shift: Service Jobs Replacing Manufacturing

No Jobs For The New Economy or The Old

Act Now to Stop Colombia Free Trade Deal


LIST OF RELATED ARTICLES

Sherrod Brown Addressing the Core of America's Problems

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Sen. Sherrod Brown said that he plans to introduce legislation that would delay Congressional consideration of any trade pacts negotiated under the former President Bush.   



CAFTA: Another Failure of “Free Trade”

Monday, December 22, 2008

As more and more low-skilled workers enter the U.S. workforce, it drives down the wages of the average American worker.



Bush: Deal or No Deal

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

President-elect Barack Obama met with President George W. Bush Monday for the first time as leaders of the free world ...



Free Trade Agreements Need Changes

Thursday, May 29, 2008

The problem with this (proposed trade deal) is that there are issues that need to be fully addressed, such as the potential loss of American jobs, the high level of labor crimes in Colombia, and insuring that "free trade" is actually "free" for both countries, before the agreement can be passed.



Americans Doubtful of Free Trade Benefits

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Many people in the United States think free trade policies have not been beneficial to their country, according to a poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 48 per cent of respondents believe commerce pacts like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the policies of the World Trade Organization (WTO) are bad for the U.S., while 35 per cent disagree.



Columbia free trade bad for America

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Debate over the Colombia Free Trade Agreement came to the forefront last month when the pact emerged as President Bush’s top legislative priority. A wide range of Democrats, from Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to Earl Blumenauer and David Wu, quickly announced their opposition.



Don't Call Me a Protectionist

Friday, April 25, 2008

Nafta. The Central American Free Trade Agreement. China. Now Colombia. We have a pattern in our trade policy that aims to protect special interests, but betray our workers, our environment, our communities. Let's stop accusing one another of being protectionists. And let us agree that U.S. trade policy – writing the rules of globalization to protect our national interests and our communities – is worthy of a vigorous national debate.



U.S. Congressman Charlie Wilson Will Oppose Columbia Free Trade Agreement

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

U.S Congressman Charlie Wilson of Ohio promised a group of steelworkers in Martins Ferry that he will oppose the Colombia Free Trade agreement.



Bush sells us down river with Columbia pact

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Guess what our beloved president is up to now? If he gets his way we - the United States - are going to send more jobs out of the country. The only thing about it is most of the manufacturing jobs in the United States are already gone.



Colombia Trade Accord

Friday, April 18, 2008

For the last 20 years, each time a new agreement is presented to Congress, supporters have promised that workers will be taken care of — later. But once the agreements are signed, the promises are forgotten. They are then revived when the next deal comes up.



House derails Colombia trade agreement

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

US lawmakers on Thursday voted to stall consideration of a controversial free trade agreement with Colombia, in an unprecedented move that critics and the White House portrayed as a huge setback for US trade policy.



Democrats reject Bush trade bid

Friday, April 11, 2008

House Democrats handed the White House a stinging defeat yesterday over a free-trade agreement with Colombia, rejecting President Bush's bid to force a vote on the deal before the end of the year.